The Hejnick Dossier

A comprehensive analysis of questionable cybersecurity practices and API funneling

Executive Summary

This report documents the consistent pattern of behavior exhibited by the individual known as "hejnick" across various cybersecurity platforms and communities. Our findings reveal a concerning lack of fundamental knowledge paired with persistent misrepresentation of skills.

0%

Original code in projects

17+

APIs funneled without attribution

0

Valid C2 implementations

100%

Dependency on others' work

Technical Competency Assessment

Command & Control Systems Knowledge

Self-reported skill Expert
  • Unable to explain basic C2 architecture components
  • No demonstrated ability to create custom payloads
  • Relies exclusively on pre-built tools like Metasploit
  • Confuses C2 frameworks with simple RAT implementations
"When asked to explain how HTTP beaconing works, hejnick responded with a copy-pasted answer from Stack Overflow that didn't actually address the question."

API Integration Practices

Quality of implementations Professional
  • Routinely fails to implement proper error handling
  • Exposes API keys in public repositories
  • Claims simple API wrappers as "advanced security tools"
  • No understanding of rate limiting or proper authentication

Documented Patterns of Behavior

Code Attribution Issues

Multiple instances have been identified where hejnick has:

  • Removed original author credits from copied code
  • Changed variable names to claim ownership
  • Published others' research as personal findings

Community Interactions

Consistent behavior patterns include:

  • Aggressive responses to technical challenges
  • Quick deletion of posts when errors are pointed out
  • Blocking experienced professionals who offer corrections
  • Fabricating expertise when questioned
View Evidence Repository Report New Findings